|
ACTIONS SPEAK LOUDER THAN WORDS...
IS THIS THE NEW NEIGHBOR
YOU WANT IN YOUR BACK YARD???
NOISE?
A booming release of steam from an El Paso Power plant in
Massachusetts shook houses and scared the bejesus out of
area residents. Neighbors of the power plant said they
were absolutely terrified of what sounded like a jet
plane crashing outside their homes and businesses. A
faulty connection between a muffler and a steam pipe was
blamed.
(Source: Union News, 4/14/00.)
BAIT AND SWITCH?
El Paso got approval to build a merchant power plant in
New England which was supposed to burn natural gas only.
When the plant was finally built, a 500,000 gallon fuel
oil storage tank was added illegally. Although the power
company admitted their guilt, the State of Massachusetts
fined them a mere $1000 for court costs and let them keep
the oil tank along with their plans to burn dirtier fuel
oil up to 30 days per year.
(Source: The Valley Advocate, 11/23/00.)
TACTICS?
In 1997, when the point man for a proposed El Paso power
plant encountered strong local opposition, he offered to
split $850,000 among opponents if they would simply stop
saying unfavorable things about the plant. When that
didn't work, he sued several members of the local
opposition group for libel. When the lawsuit was thrown
out of court, he again offered a payment to the power plant
opponents if they would back down -- followed by a press
release in which he accused power plant opponents of trying
to extort money from him!
(Source: The Valley Advocate, 11/23/00.)
FINANCES?
The City of Agawam, Massachusetts has refused to give an
El Paso merchant power plant an occupancy certificate for
their merchant power plant because the power plant failed
to come up with cash, a letter of credit, or a guarantee
from a bonding company to assure the city that the expenses
of demolishing the plant when it reached the end of its
active life would be covered. The plant also had not made
its final payment to the contractor who built the plant.
(Sources: The Valley Advocate, 12/7/00 and 5/17/01.)
HANKY PANKY?
El Paso Corporation, owner of the ANR natural gas
pipelines which would feed the proposed power plants in
Muskego and New Berlin, was accused of using its monopoly
power to manipulate natural gas prices in California,
adding to the power crisis there earlier this year. The
judge overseeing the case expressed impatience with El
Paso company executives who he said engaged in "hanky
panky" in arranging natural gas pipeline shipments.
The judge said telephone records of El Paso's conversations
showed "blatant collusion" and insider dealing
between the company and its affiliates, violating federal
rules. El Paso Power has denied any wrong-doing.
(Sources: Reuters News Service, 10/9/01, Los Angeles
Times, 10/10/01.)
PLANT SAFETY? Remember the "Big Blue" crane disaster at
Miller Park? At one of El Paso's natural gas power plant
construction sites in Connecticut just last year, two
workers in aerial lifts were killed and two others
injured when an 80 foot arch weighing several hundred
tons collapsed and fell onto the arm of a crane.
Onlookers said the tangled mess reminded them of of a
pile of pickup sticks. OSHA determined that the
contractor did not follow standard procedures and failed
to brace a steam generator unit which fell on the crane.
OSHA imposed the maximum fine allowed by law for failure
"to provide a place of employment free from
recognized hazards likely to cause death or serious
physical harm." The crane operator, who was trapped
for hours and had his leg amputated, is suing the
contractor and PDC-El Paso Milford, LLC, claiming his
injuries were caused by their negligence. PDC-El Paso,
LLC owns the plant and coordinated the engineering and
construction of the plant.
(Sources: CBS News, 2/3/00; The News Times, 2/3/00 and 2/5/00;
OSHA News Release, 7/7/00; Bridgeport Post, 7/8/00; New
Haven Register, 3/3/01.)
A spark from a power line can create a fire and explosion
hazard if there is an accidental or routine gas release
during testing of relief valves. Relief valves were
located directly beneath high voltage power lines at El
Paso Power's Hayden, Arizona power plant. The Federal
Office of Pipeline Safety ordered El Paso to correct this
safety violation 1999.
(Source: Warning Letter from U.S. DOT Office of Pipeline
Security to El Paso Natural Gas Company, August 19, 1999.)
PIPELINE SAFETY?
El Paso Natural Gas has experienced at least 40 pipeline
ruptures since 1985. El Paso Power company bought our
local ANR natural gas pipelines last year from Coastal.
El Paso's ANR pipelines would feed both the Muskego and
New Berlin power plant sites.
In August, 2000 El Paso Natural Gas was the culprit in
the worst pipeline explosion in the continental United
States in nearly 25 years. As a result, 12 people in New
Mexico died and El Paso is facing the largest fine ever
imposed for pipeline safety violations by The U.S.
Department of Transportation ($2.5 million). Three years
before the disaster, El Paso was
warned of potential pipeline corrosion problems in New
Mexico. When corrosion finally ruptured a 30-inch El Paso
pipe near Carlsbad, New Mexico, vibrations from the
explosion were picked up by seismic monitoring devices 60
miles away and 50-story high flames shot into the air!
When firefighters came within a half-mile of the site, they
were driven back by the heat, fearful that it would melt
the paint off their trucks.
A few months before the explosion the El Paso Energy
Pipeline Group president submitted a statement to the
Senate Energy and Transportation Committee opposing any
legislation that would increase fines to pipeline
operators for violating safety laws. After the explosion,
a proposal
was floated before Congress to improve pipeline safety
and inspection, particularly since the federal government
has only 55 inspectors to cover 2 million miles of
pipeline. A spokesperson for El Paso Energy Company said
they did not endorse the pending legislation "but
will do what it
takes to make sure this kind of incident doesn't happen
again."
Just one year after the New Mexico disaster, another
section of El Paso's pipeline failed in Arizona. The 24
inch pipe leaked natural gas for an hour, then ignited.
Area residents could see the fire from 3 miles away and
were evacuated. Fortunately, no one was injured. El Paso
repaired the pipeline, pumping gas through it the very
next day after the accident. However,
the Office of Pipeline Security stepped in and forced El
Paso to shut the pipeline down, citing likely serious
harm to life, property and the environment, especially
given that the cause of the pipeline rupture was unknown
and the pipeline was close to places where people
gathered.
(Sources: Oil and Gas News, Western Governor's
Association, 8-25-00 and 9-1-00; Cox Washington Bureau, 8-22-00;
Houston Business Journal, 6-22-01, Dayton Daily News, 8-22-01;
Warning Letter from U.S. DOT Office of Pipeline Security
to El Paso Natural Gas Company, August 19, 1999 and
August 14, 2001.)
TERRORISM?
Pipeline and power grid security has become an urgent
priority since the September 11 terrorist attacks, and
energy companies have been scrambling to increase
protection. Within hours of the terrorist attacks on the
World Trade Center and the Pentagon, the FBI issued an
alert to utilities to increase security and report
suspicious activities. Regional security coordinators at
the North American Electric Reliability Council have been
directed by the FBI to step up protection of the power
grid, which is a highly desireable terrorist target. A
new day has dawned, and utility inndustries leaders say
the future of the utility business will be marked by
drastic changes in security, the re-evaluation of power
grid vulnerabilities, and the ability to respond quickly
to emergencies. For example, U.S. soldiers would have
about seven seconds to fire a missile and destroy a
commercial airliner travelling 500 mph that is one mile
away from a power plant.
Senior U.S. officials have said they are concerned about
future attacks on symbols of American culture and power,
including car bombs or truck bombs exploding near natural
gas lines or power plants. Much of the security now in
place would not thwart a determined terrorist. Security
for the nation's power grid presents a particular
challenge, as thousands of miles of high-voltage lines
crisscross America and surveillance equipment monitors
only a handful of key locations along pipelines. Attacks
at key points could trigger vast power outages because
grids are widely interconnected.
Since the September 11 attack, the Federal Energy
Regulation Commission (FERC) announced that energy firms
need to adopt new procedures, update existing procedure,
beef up security staffs and improve physical protection
of facilities to safeguard the electrical transmission
and gas pipeline systems. Pipeline companies are putting
people into previously unmanned facilities, beefing up
security at terminals and key pumping stations, and
increasing patrols along the hundreds of thousands of
miles of pipeline.
The future risk of terrorist attacks is so significant
that major reinsurance companies are no longer providing
property or casualty insurance for terrorist attacks
after December 31, 2001. Without such coverage, banks
will not accept the risk of lending to new construction
projects, such as new power plants or new pipelines. The
U.S. government, therefore, is considering stepping in
with a taxpayer bailout to help cover the costs of
rebuilding these facilities in the event of a future
terrorist attacks.
(Source: Reuters News Service, 9-14-01; 9-25-01, 10-5-01,
10-18-01; Associated Press, 9-17-01, 10-24-01; Power
Engineering International Magazine, 10-11-01, U.S.
Newswire, 10-15-01, Business Wire, 10-24-01.)
In 1999 the Federal Office of Pipeline security cited El
Paso Natural Gas Company for pipeline security violations
in Arizona. El Paso failed to lock and fence 3
transmission line valves that were near a public road or
area to prevent tampering.
(Source: Warning Letter from U.S. DOT Office of Pipeline
Security to El Paso Natural Gas Company, August 19, 1999.)
WEBSITE SOURCE REFERENCES
NOISE
http://www.masslive.com/news/pstories/ag414pow.html
El PASO PLANT SAFETY
http://www.cbsnews.com/now/story/0,1597,156326-412,00.shtml
http://www.newstimes.com/archive2000/feb03/rgf.htm
http://www.newstimes.com/archive2000/feb05/rgf.htm
http://www.osha.gov/media/oshnews/july00/reg1-20000707.html
http://www.laborers.org/Bridgeport_Nobili_7-8-00.html
http://server3001.freeyellow.com/thersites/PDCElPasoNews2.html
EL PASO PIPELINE SAFETY
http://www.coxnews.com/washingtonbureau/staff/nesmith/
08-22-00PIPELINE22COX.html
http://ops.dot.gov/carlsbad/carlsbad1.htm
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/WhatcomCreek/messages
(Message 1800: Pipeline news: Corrective Action order
issued ...
8/28/01)
http://www.westgov.org/wieb/news/oilgas00.htm
BAIT AND SWITCH
http://www.valleyadvocate.com/articles/armitage.html
TACTICS
http://www.valleyadvocate.com/articles/armitage.html
FINANCES
http://www.newmassmedia.com/nac.phtml?code=wma&db=nac_fea&
ref=13845
http://www.newmassmedia.com/nac.phtml?code=wma&db=nac_fea&
ref=16026
TERRORISM
http://pei.pennnet.com/Articles/Article_Display.cfm?Section=
OnlineArticles&SubSection=INDUS&PUBLICATION_ID=17&
ARTICLE_ID=121863&VERSION_NUM=1
|