ACTIONS SPEAK LOUDER THAN WORDS...
IS THIS THE NEW NEIGHBOR
YOU WANT IN YOUR BACK YARD???

NOISE? A booming release of steam from an El Paso Power plant in Massachusetts shook houses and scared the bejesus out of area residents. Neighbors of the power plant said they were absolutely terrified of what sounded like a jet plane crashing outside their homes and businesses. A faulty connection between a muffler and a steam pipe was blamed.
(Source: Union News, 4/14/00.)

BAIT AND SWITCH? El Paso got approval to build a merchant power plant in New England which was supposed to burn natural gas only. When the plant was finally built, a 500,000 gallon fuel oil storage tank was added illegally. Although the power company admitted their guilt, the State of Massachusetts fined them a mere $1000 for court costs and let them keep the oil tank along with their plans to burn dirtier fuel oil up to 30 days per year.
(Source: The Valley Advocate, 11/23/00.)

TACTICS? In 1997, when the point man for a proposed El Paso power plant encountered strong local opposition, he offered to split $850,000 among opponents if they would simply stop saying unfavorable things about the plant. When that didn't work, he sued several members of the local opposition group for libel. When the lawsuit was thrown out of court, he again offered a payment to the power plant opponents if they would back down -- followed by a press release in which he accused power plant opponents of trying to extort money from him!
(Source: The Valley Advocate, 11/23/00.)

FINANCES? The City of Agawam, Massachusetts has refused to give an El Paso merchant power plant an occupancy certificate for their merchant power plant because the power plant failed to come up with cash, a letter of credit, or a guarantee from a bonding company to assure the city that the expenses of demolishing the plant when it reached the end of its active life would be covered. The plant also had not made its final payment to the contractor who built the plant.
(Sources: The Valley Advocate, 12/7/00 and 5/17/01.)

HANKY PANKY? El Paso Corporation, owner of the ANR natural gas pipelines which would feed the proposed power plants in Muskego and New Berlin, was accused of using its monopoly power to manipulate natural gas prices in California, adding to the power crisis there earlier this year. The judge overseeing the case expressed impatience with El Paso company executives who he said engaged in "hanky panky" in arranging natural gas pipeline shipments. The judge said telephone records of El Paso's conversations showed "blatant collusion" and insider dealing between the company and its affiliates, violating federal rules. El Paso Power has denied any wrong-doing.
(Sources: Reuters News Service, 10/9/01, Los Angeles Times, 10/10/01.)

PLANT SAFETY? Remember the "Big Blue" crane disaster at Miller Park? At one of El Paso's natural gas power plant construction sites in Connecticut just last year, two workers in aerial lifts were killed and two others injured when an 80 foot arch weighing several hundred tons collapsed and fell onto the arm of a crane. Onlookers said the tangled mess reminded them of of a pile of pickup sticks. OSHA determined that the contractor did not follow standard procedures and failed to brace a steam generator unit which fell on the crane. OSHA imposed the maximum fine allowed by law for failure "to provide a place of employment free from recognized hazards likely to cause death or serious physical harm." The crane operator, who was trapped for hours and had his leg amputated, is suing the contractor and PDC-El Paso Milford, LLC, claiming his injuries were caused by their negligence. PDC-El Paso, LLC owns the plant and coordinated the engineering and construction of the plant.
(Sources: CBS News, 2/3/00; The News Times, 2/3/00 and 2/5/00; OSHA News Release, 7/7/00; Bridgeport Post, 7/8/00; New Haven Register, 3/3/01.)

A spark from a power line can create a fire and explosion hazard if there is an accidental or routine gas release during testing of relief valves. Relief valves were located directly beneath high voltage power lines at El Paso Power's Hayden, Arizona power plant. The Federal Office of Pipeline Safety ordered El Paso to correct this safety violation 1999.
(Source: Warning Letter from U.S. DOT Office of Pipeline Security to El Paso Natural Gas Company, August 19, 1999.)

PIPELINE SAFETY? El Paso Natural Gas has experienced at least 40 pipeline ruptures since 1985. El Paso Power company bought our local ANR natural gas pipelines last year from Coastal. El Paso's ANR pipelines would feed both the Muskego and New Berlin power plant sites.

In August, 2000 El Paso Natural Gas was the culprit in the worst pipeline explosion in the continental United States in nearly 25 years. As a result, 12 people in New Mexico died and El Paso is facing the largest fine ever imposed for pipeline safety violations by The U.S. Department of Transportation ($2.5 million). Three years before the disaster, El Paso was
warned of potential pipeline corrosion problems in New Mexico. When corrosion finally ruptured a 30-inch El Paso pipe near Carlsbad, New Mexico, vibrations from the explosion were picked up by seismic monitoring devices 60 miles away and 50-story high flames shot into the air! When firefighters came within a half-mile of the site, they were driven back by the heat, fearful that it would melt the paint off their trucks.

A few months before the explosion the El Paso Energy Pipeline Group president submitted a statement to the Senate Energy and Transportation Committee opposing any legislation that would increase fines to pipeline operators for violating safety laws. After the explosion, a proposal
was floated before Congress to improve pipeline safety and inspection, particularly since the federal government has only 55 inspectors to cover 2 million miles of pipeline. A spokesperson for El Paso Energy Company said they did not endorse the pending legislation "but will do what it
takes to make sure this kind of incident doesn't happen again."

Just one year after the New Mexico disaster, another section of El Paso's pipeline failed in Arizona. The 24 inch pipe leaked natural gas for an hour, then ignited. Area residents could see the fire from 3 miles away and were evacuated. Fortunately, no one was injured. El Paso repaired the pipeline, pumping gas through it the very next day after the accident. However,
the Office of Pipeline Security stepped in and forced El Paso to shut the pipeline down, citing likely serious harm to life, property and the environment, especially given that the cause of the pipeline rupture was unknown and the pipeline was close to places where people gathered.
(Sources: Oil and Gas News, Western Governor's Association, 8-25-00 and 9-1-00; Cox Washington Bureau, 8-22-00; Houston Business Journal, 6-22-01, Dayton Daily News, 8-22-01; Warning Letter from U.S. DOT Office of Pipeline Security to El Paso Natural Gas Company, August 19, 1999 and August 14, 2001.)

TERRORISM? Pipeline and power grid security has become an urgent priority since the September 11 terrorist attacks, and energy companies have been scrambling to increase protection. Within hours of the terrorist attacks on the World Trade Center and the Pentagon, the FBI issued an alert to utilities to increase security and report suspicious activities. Regional security coordinators at the North American Electric Reliability Council have been directed by the FBI to step up protection of the power grid, which is a highly desireable terrorist target. A new day has dawned, and utility inndustries leaders say the future of the utility business will be marked by drastic changes in security, the re-evaluation of power grid vulnerabilities, and the ability to respond quickly to emergencies. For example, U.S. soldiers would have about seven seconds to fire a missile and destroy a commercial airliner travelling 500 mph that is one mile away from a power plant.

Senior U.S. officials have said they are concerned about future attacks on symbols of American culture and power, including car bombs or truck bombs exploding near natural gas lines or power plants. Much of the security now in place would not thwart a determined terrorist. Security for the nation's power grid presents a particular challenge, as thousands of miles of high-voltage lines crisscross America and surveillance equipment monitors only a handful of key locations along pipelines. Attacks at key points could trigger vast power outages because grids are widely interconnected.

Since the September 11 attack, the Federal Energy Regulation Commission (FERC) announced that energy firms need to adopt new procedures, update existing procedure, beef up security staffs and improve physical protection of facilities to safeguard the electrical transmission and gas pipeline systems. Pipeline companies are putting people into previously unmanned facilities, beefing up security at terminals and key pumping stations, and increasing patrols along the hundreds of thousands of miles of pipeline.

The future risk of terrorist attacks is so significant that major reinsurance companies are no longer providing property or casualty insurance for terrorist attacks after December 31, 2001. Without such coverage, banks will not accept the risk of lending to new construction projects, such as new power plants or new pipelines. The U.S. government, therefore, is considering stepping in with a taxpayer bailout to help cover the costs of rebuilding these facilities in the event of a future terrorist attacks.
(Source: Reuters News Service, 9-14-01; 9-25-01, 10-5-01, 10-18-01; Associated Press, 9-17-01, 10-24-01; Power Engineering International Magazine, 10-11-01, U.S. Newswire, 10-15-01, Business Wire, 10-24-01.)

In 1999 the Federal Office of Pipeline security cited El Paso Natural Gas Company for pipeline security violations in Arizona. El Paso failed to lock and fence 3 transmission line valves that were near a public road or area to prevent tampering.
(Source: Warning Letter from U.S. DOT Office of Pipeline Security to El Paso Natural Gas Company, August 19, 1999.)




WEBSITE SOURCE REFERENCES

NOISE
http://www.masslive.com/news/pstories/ag414pow.html

El PASO PLANT SAFETY
http://www.cbsnews.com/now/story/0,1597,156326-412,00.shtml
http://www.newstimes.com/archive2000/feb03/rgf.htm
http://www.newstimes.com/archive2000/feb05/rgf.htm
http://www.osha.gov/media/oshnews/july00/reg1-20000707.html
http://www.laborers.org/Bridgeport_Nobili_7-8-00.html
http://server3001.freeyellow.com/thersites/PDCElPasoNews2.html

EL PASO PIPELINE SAFETY
http://www.coxnews.com/washingtonbureau/staff/nesmith/ 08-22-00PIPELINE22COX.html
http://ops.dot.gov/carlsbad/carlsbad1.htm
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/WhatcomCreek/messages
(Message 1800: Pipeline news: Corrective Action order issued ...
8/28/01)
http://www.westgov.org/wieb/news/oilgas00.htm

BAIT AND SWITCH
http://www.valleyadvocate.com/articles/armitage.html

TACTICS
http://www.valleyadvocate.com/articles/armitage.html

FINANCES
http://www.newmassmedia.com/nac.phtml?code=wma&db=nac_fea& ref=13845
http://www.newmassmedia.com/nac.phtml?code=wma&db=nac_fea& ref=16026

TERRORISM
http://pei.pennnet.com/Articles/Article_Display.cfm?Section= OnlineArticles&SubSection=INDUS&PUBLICATION_ID=17& ARTICLE_ID=121863&VERSION_NUM=1